Regeneration of ischemic cardiac muscle and vascular endothelium by adult stem cells
Kathyjo A. Jackson, Susan M. Majka, Hongyu Wang, Jennifer Pocius, Craig J. Hartley, Mark W. Majesky, Mark L. Entman, Lloyd H. Michael, Karen K. Hirschi, and Margaret A. Goodell
Introduction
The blockage of a blood vessel eventually results in myocardial ischemia, a condition that promotes rapid myocardial necrosis of the heart and scar tissue formation. Consequent re-perfusion of the vessel and heart repairs the ventricular wall to only a limited capacity. Cardiac myocytes cannot replicate, and the ventricular walls are replaced by scarring. Without treatment, ischemic heart muscle pumps blood and oxygen less efficiently, and may lead to heart failure and stroke.
This study seeks to explore the potential of adult stem cell therapy for repairing ischemic heart muscle. The researchers transplanted side population (SP) cells, enriched hematopoietic CD34- stem cells, into mice rendered ischemic by coronary artery blockage. SP cells were shown previously to regenerate cardiac myofibers and blood vessels in injured cardiac tissue. Subsequent measurements of cardiomyocyte and endothelial cell differentiation were taken based on donor marker identification (lacZ gene expression).
Materials and Methods
Bone marrow specimens were extracted from the tibias and femurs of 6-Rosa transgenic mice, which express lacZ. To isolate SP cells, which account for 0.05% of whole bone marrow, the specimens underwent Hoechst dye staining and specific protein expression—most SP cells are positive for the markers c-Kit and PECAM-1. A triple-laser instrument was used to sort the desired SP cells through fluorescence emission analysis; the purity of SP cells in the sorted samples always exceeded 91%.
2,000 SP cells isolated from male 6-Rosa-Ly-5.2 mice were injected into irradiated female 6-Ly-5.1 mice. 10 weeks after the stem cell transplantation, the left anterior descending coronary artery of each mouse was blocked for 60 minutes, and followed by reperfusion. Two or four weeks after the injury, the hearts were removed and frozen for immunohistochemical analysis.
Frozen sections of tissue were fixed with paraformaldehyde and stained for lacZ expression. Specific antibodies were used to identify cardiac muscle (anti-α-actinin) and endothelial cells (anti-ICAM-1). Hematopoietic cells were visualized using anti-Ly-5-biotin. Slides of stained tissues were analyzed with fluorescence and differential interference contrast microscopy. SP cells and their progeny could be detected through lacZ expression, since they were derived from the 6-Rosa transgenic mice, which express lacZ.
Results
22 mice received bone marrow transplants; the coronary artery blockage procedure was performed on 19 of the mice—the remaining 3 mice acted as the control, where no procedure was done. After the hearts were sectioned, lacZ staining existed mostly in the capillaries. Co-staining with antibodies against Flt-1 and ICAM-1 illustrated that the SP cells had migrated to the injured heart through the circulation, localized to new vessels, and integrated into the surface linings (Figure 1). There were no lacZ-positive cells in the control mice.
Figure 1—Sections incorporated into vascular endothelial cells. (a-d): X-gal stained tissue for SP cell incorporation. (e-l): cardiac tissue as above, but stained for endothelial marker expression (Flt-1 and ICAM-1).
LacZ-positive cells were also incorporated into cardiac muscle; cardiac tissue from treated mice included staining throughout the heart. LacX-positive cells clustered at the edge of the myocardial scar, where most of the damage resides. Figure 2 illustrates the distribution of lacZ staining within cardiac tissue.
Figure 2—LacZ staining accumulates at the border of the myocardial scar. (a): X10 photograph of a mouse myocardial infarction after 4 weeks. The arrow points at the lacZ staining location. (b): X20 pictograph of the same lacZ area. Open arrowheads indicate macrophages. (c) X40 pictograph. (d) macrophage density after 1 hour of ischemia and 3 hours of perfusion.
Table 1 shows the array of lacZ-positive cells in various mouse subjects. 100 sections from each animal were analyzed, and the degree of lacZ staining was quantified. Each section contained about 13,000 cardiomyoctes; there was a mean engraftment of 0.02% for SD cells of all cardiomyocytes. 100 vessel profiles were analyzed per tissue section in terms of cell engraftment. The mean prevalence of lacZ-positive vessels was about 3%.
Table 1—Table illustrating the percent engraftment for cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells with regards to lacZ cell presence. Cardiac tissue analyses were conducted on 4 mice.
Discussion
Because myocardial infarction is a major cause of heart failure, new sources of cells are needed for transplantation and heart muscle regeneration. SP cells represent a progenitor population both accessible from a patient’s own tissue and adaptable for clinical use. This study demonstrates the ability of purified stem cells derived from mouse bone marrow to participate in cardiac muscle regeneration following ischemia. The SP cells marked with the lacZ gene migrated into cardiac myofibers, and aided in the regeneration process. In addition, the study showed that lacZ-positive cells could participate in vascularization within heart tissue. The utilization of SP cells into the regeneration of endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes suggests the role of circulating stem cells for tissue repair.
Critique
The study demonstrates the therapeutic potential of SP cells for cardiac tissue regeneration. Clinical trials on mice do indeed show incorporation of stem cells into the heart’s scar formation, as well as new endothelial tissue. The research does a good job in establishing a control group to see the effect of SP cells on a healthy mouse heart. Unfortunately, many limitations exist within this study. The researchers rely on lacZ expression as the major identifier of migrating SP cells. Other identifiers such as surface markers and morphology could have been obtained to establish a more reliable identification method. The study analyzed only 4 mice with regards to heart tissue, due to the large number of mice that died after the coronary artery procedure. A larger sample size may reveal better results. In addition, the amount of SP cell engraftment was relatively low for both cardiac muscle and endothelial tissue. Further studies involving SP cells and the tissue regeneration rate of live mice would be helpful.
9 comments:
It is a little worrisome that most of the mice died after the procedure since this is the aim of research. However, it is still in its beginning stages, it isn't too big of a deal. This summary was very clear and provided a good background discussion of the purpose of this research. As for the purity, is 91% considered extremely good or is there some room for improvement?
I agree that more mice would definitely help clarify the results. But another thing to consider is that while the stem cells clustered at the wounded area, it is important to see if the stem cells aggregated in any other location in the body and if it caused any problems with the body.
I agree that the high experimental mortality rate presents significant obstacles to the research. However, since the mice had to be irradiated in order to induce heart vessel ischemia, the high death rate seems logical. For the purity, SP cells typically make up only 0.05% of whole bone marrow. To achieve a 91% purity rate is commendable. However, research protocol and isolation can always be improved.
I also agree in using a larger sample pool. Because it is difficult to specifically control stem cell migration, further research on stem cell aggregation side effects would be helpful.
I was wondering, since Barnabas brought up the point about the possibility of stem cells causing problems in the rest of the body, would these SP cells also cause problems in the heart itself? I understand the heart is targeted, but will the SP cells differentiate to match the surrounding organ's cells, or can/will they cause problems?
This results of this study appear to be in their initial stages with respect to broader-scale medical impact. Since myocardial infarction is growing in its prevalence, drawing on adult stem cells for repair of damaged or scar tissue is essential. For this purpose, this study provides some initial insight. I did not understand the necessity of using stem cells derived from one mouse line and implanting them into another mouse line. It seems to make more sense to use an autologus source and use either stem cells derived from the same mouse line or the same mouse itself. This way, immunocompatibility problems would also be more limited.
I agree, it would also have been nice if more markers were used to assay for the presence and migration of stem celzs as opposed to only lacZ expression. Furthermore, I think it is necessary to derive results from a larger sample size, as previously mentioned. Although the study began with a greater number of mice, only 4 survived the experimental procedures to be studied. Perhaps extending this study to a larger number of mice would yield more reliable and interesting results.
It seems that using autologous stem cells would be an important improvement in this study, because I would think that would be the main use in a clinical setting. Nevertheless, it is exciting that SP cells have the possibility of repairing ischemic tissue.
I agree with the other posters about needing a larger sample size and the mortality rate of the mice. I feel there is another concern, which may or may not have been studied in this research. If the cells used were stem cells, what is there to be said about unlimited proliferation of these cells? Is there a way to stop the growth of these stem cells, once a healthy level is reached. It makes sense to re-establish the cardiomyocite cell numbers, but is there any worry of tumor formation as a result of over proliferation?
As the other commenters mentioned, the mortality rates of the mice and the efficiency of the treatment is rather troublesome. I think it would be interesting if they explore cell sheet engineering as a way of treating myocardial infraction tissue. I know that studies have been done using this technique that allows the ECM proteins to be intact, which might improve the efficiency. Also, the stem cells used in this study may go rogue and become tumorigenic, so caution should be used in using stem cells as therapeutic agents.
I also agree that the result using only 4 mice cannot confirm the capability of stem cell engraftment. More data with more mice are required, and there are possible questions to be answered, too. Do the engrafted cells have the same strength as the original cardiac cells? Are there any chance of adverse immune response? (These questions are quite broad but still need to be answered before put in to human use.)
Post a Comment