Monday, November 01, 2010

Cartilage engineered in predetermined shapes employing cell transplantation on synthetic biodegradable polymers

Woo Seob Kim, Joseph P. Vacanti, Linda Cima, David Mooney, Joseph Upton, Wolfgang C. Puelacher, Charles A. Vacan. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 94, No. 2, pp. 233-237. August 1994.

Introduction During plastic and reconstructive surgery, inorganic materials are often implanted to provide support to produce the desired aesthetic or reconstructive effect. However, these inorganic materials are often recognized as foreign bodies by the body's immune system, leading to infection and ultimate rejection. If cartilage is to be safely and successfully implanted in patients, it must be immune-capatible. In this study, a team of researchers and medical doctors designed biodegradable polymers in a variety of shapes (e.g. triangle, rectangle, cross, cylinder), seeded them with chondrocytes, and observed the specimens during a 12-week time course. The chondrocytes were observed to take on the shape of their scaffolds with little evidence of resorption by the body or overgrowth beyond the bounds of the scaffold. These results suggest that autogenous cartilage, developed from a patient's own cells and grown on a pre-designed scaffold holds promise for use in the fields of plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Materials and Methods Researchers began with an entanglement of polyglycolic acid fabric (PGA), whose fibers are randomly arranged. This was then submersed in a 2% (w/v) solution of poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), which chemically bonds the fibers of PGA by forming cross-linkages. After removal from solution, the polymer constructs were cut into the desired geometric shapes: a triangle,a rectangle, and a cross.


Cartilage was harvested from a bovine source and washed in povidone-iodine 10% solution. Chondrocytes were subsequently harvested and concentrated to 5x107 cells per mL. 100uL of this solution was seeded into the scaffolds and supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and an assortment of amino acids and antibiotics. Cell nutrients were labeled with BrdU to allow researchers to identify implanted cells. The cell-polymer constructs were incubated in 5% carbon dioxide at 37 degrees Celsius, with the culture medium replaced every 3 days. After a week, the cell-polymer constructs were subcutaneously implanted into the dorsum of mice. For the cylindrical cartilage scaffolds, sheets of the polymer construct were cut into rectangles and seeded with chondrocytes that were incubated for a week. These polymer-cell constructs were then wrapped around 2.5 cm long silicone rods of 3mm diameter before being subcutaneously implanted into the dorsum of mice. After 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks, mice were sacrificed and specimens evaluated with histological stains. Results and Discussion Gross examination of the non-cylindrical scaffolds (12 triangles, 12 rectangles, 12 crosses) showed that all scaffolds were replaced with chondrocytes that retained approximately the same shape as the scaffold. Two of the 12 cylindrical constructs became infected and were extruded through the skin -- the other 10 remained subcutaneous and showed replacement be chondrocytes, with retention of scaffold shape.


Histological staining showed that cells found on the periphery of the implants were more disordered and less mature than those located centrally, which exhibited deeper basophilic staining that suggests increased mucopolysaccharide concentration characteristic of mature cartilage. Immunohistochemical staining found BrdU labeling in the periphery of the cartilage, suggesting that cells located in this region were produced after in-vitro culturing. By week 3, the polymer fibers of the polymer-cell implants had begun degrading, with degradation continuing throughout the 12-week time course of the study.

Critique While this study represents a promising advance in creation and manipulation of autologous cartilage constructs, there are still several problems that must be addressed before this technique becomes feasible for use in human patients. To begin with, the time course of this study is relative short (12 weeks), whereas most cartilaginous implants are expected to last the duration of a patient's life. It is unclear if the shape of the cartilage may change past the 12 week mark; if the cartilage was to begin to lose its shape or lose its structural integrity, these implants would no longer be appropriate for use in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Researchers must also address the mechanical properties of cartilage formed on these scaffolds -- do they have the structural integrity of naturally-occuring cartilage? Can the mechanical properties be varied as a function of experimental parameters (e.g. density of injected cells, growth medium conditions)? This is an important aspect to address because cartilage used in different parts of the body may require different mechanical properties. A third problem the researchers may consider addressing is the immunoreactivity of their implants. It is interesting to note that in this study, chondrocytes harvested from calves were injected into scaffolds that were then implanted into mice. No mention of immune reactions is noted besides the two cylindrical scaffolds that were extruded. It is unclear if this immune reaction is due to the calf chondrocytes or perhaps the scaffold. Though 12 weeks is conceivably sufficiently long for an immune response to be elicited and noticed, long-term effects are unlikely to be noticed during the time course of this study. In conclusion, this paper presents a novel, perhaps revolutionary way for cartilaginous implants to be used in plastic and reconstructive surgery. However, before human implantation becomes even remotely feasible, researchers and medical doctors must take into account a host of factors that may influence the feasibility of such a design.


13 comments:

Hayley Lam said...

It is not clear to me why they chose those particular shapes (triangle, rectangle, cross) which leaves me rather confused as to the purpose of that. And, I don't see any quantification and/or imaging of the BrdU stained cells - was there any benefit to the in vitro seeded chondrocytes?

Joanna said...

I am just curious as what it means when you say that by week 3 the polymer fibers were degrading. Is that a good or bad thing? Also, I was thinking about the time scale as well as I was reading the summary but since this paper was published in a pretty substantial journal, do you think that there is reasonable merit to their selection of such a time frame?

Joyce said...

In this study, the authors concluded that autogenous cartilage grown on biodegradable polymers is promising for reconstructive surgery, I feel that the time point is way too short, for the study fails to discuss the effects of degradation of the biomaterials. Usually, the degradation of polymers within the body would yield inflammatory response. This study doesn't really discuss whether or not there will be inflammatory response and how severe it is. In addition, they didn't really test the performance of the regenerated cartilage. Are these cartilage actually functional? How well are they integrated with the cells/tissues at the implantation site?

Fang(Zoey) Huang said...

The idea of this paper is great and could be widely used in medical application. However, I have the same question as Hayley, why they design the polymers in variety of shapes? Is it because different part of the body needs different shape? Or they just want to randomly test the ability of cells to form the same shape of the polymer? The researchers of this paper didn't consider different people might have different ability to generate the cartilage, therefore I don't know if 3 weeks is enough for every patient. So some change should be made so that the degradation rate could be controlled. And like Acourac said in the critique, they didn't consider that cartilage in different part of the body would have different stiffness, and this should be considered into the design.

Richard C said...

It seems the article, although presenting an interesting premise, did not address what would seem more clinically significant applications of shaped cartilage, such as eventual shaping and implantation in high wear areas, such as the joints in the fingers or the knee.

In response to Joyce, the severe inflammation occurring from the breakdown of polymers is typically from the accumulation of microscopic slivers breaking of in high wear areas. PGA is hydrolyzed and broken down by the body, and so severe inflammation should not be expected. I also agree that a more practical application should be explored.

Angela said...

I agree with the fact that the paper still needs to address many additional factors, mainly mechanical properties of the scaffold, controlling degradation rate, and immune response. Were the mice immunocompromised prior to implantation of the scaffold? Also, I was wondering what the controls were for the in vivo experiment - did they implant scaffolds with no chondrocytes as a negative control?

Josh Liu said...

Seeding the chondrocytes on differently-shaped scaffolds seems slightly irrelevant as to the final clinical application witin this study. To address the issue of immunoreactivity, perhaps using autologous cells may simplify complications (this would be directly applicable to human trials). In addition, it is highly uncharacteristic of the researchers to omit testing the mechanical properties of their cartilage constructs. These cartilaginous constructs should ideally represent natural cartilage as found within the body. Without proper mechanical testing, how can we be sure of their functional effectiveness?

Tara said...

I agree with several of the earlier comments in that while this may be the foundation for cell transplantation, there is still much room for exploration, optimization and overall improvement. Even though the eventual goal of the study is to use an autogenous source of cartiliage to promote immunocompatibility, in this specific study they used chondrocytes of bovine origin and implanted them into mice. It seems obvious that there should be an associated immune response. It is strange to me that no measures are taken to observe the type of immune response generated by the introduction of this construct with foreign cells.
Additionally, it would have been nice for the authors to perform and report some time of mechanical testing on their various shapes of biodegradeable polymers, to give the readers a sense of stress, strain, and overall mechanical strength associated with each design. Otherwise, it is difficult to justify and compare across results why these particular shapes were employed in this study.

Fenix said...

I agree that the shape of the polymer may affect the mechanical strength of the scaffold as well as the degradation rate and the pore size affects the proliferation of the chondrocytes. However the experiment period is too short to either make solid conflusion on cell proliferation on the scaffold or the scaffold replacement by cartilage after it is degraded.

Eric Johnson said...

As with any implant, the biocompatibility is always of concern, but I am particularly interested in the mechanical properties of the implants. Cartilage in the body varies greatly in mechanical properties, so is there a way of tuning the implant to match its destination? This would be an important issue to consider in further research.

Hinesh Patel said...

I agree with Hayley, I am unsure about their geometry selection and whether it has any biological basis. In addition, I wonder if they tried various other types of polymeric materials that might exhibit different mechanical properties to see if this caused differences in terms of proliferation or maturation of the chondrocytes.

acourac said...

To answer the question of why the researchers chose these polymer shapes, I believe it is to show that even with seeding an growth of the cartilage fibers, the overall cartilage-polymer complex still maintained roughly the original shape (i.e. the cartilage didn't spread everywhere and form an amorphous blob). This suggests that in medical applications precise shapes can be manufactured and inserted into the body according to the need (i.e. cylinders, blocks, etc.)

ZeusCrisis said...

This is an interesting article. Even though there are still some challenges, once its long-term safety is confirmed autogenous material will start to replace the inorganice materials that are now in use for plastic surgery.

@hayley & acourac
I just see the particular shapes as simple representatives of various shapes. But I'm still wondering if those shapes are easier to be manufactured because the researchers might have considered mass production of those shapes in the future.