Sunday, October 21, 2007

Microfluidic Environment for High Density Hepatocyte Culture

by: M. Zhang, P. Lee, P. Hung, T. Johnson, L. Lee, M. Mofrad

When hepatocytes are isolated from tissue and grown in monolayer culture, they experience rapid loss of liver-specific function. Current methods used to improve in vitro hepatocyte culture include the growth of hepatocytes on extracellular matrix treated surfaces or the formation of spheroid hepatocyte aggregates. Although these hepatocyte aggregates maintain long term hepatocyte functions in vitro more effectively than monolayer counterparts, recent microfluidic technologies offer many advantageous features that allow better control of cell culture microenvironments and in turn hepatocyte behavior. This paper describes a bioreactor with a microfluidic environment that mimics physiological liver mass transport to allow hepatocytes to be cultured in high-density arrays and maintained in a tissue-like microarchitecture of extensive cell-cell contact in close contact with nutrient circulation. The microfluidic environment also enables hepatocytes to be cultured at a high density without nutrient limitation for over one week by maintaining a continuous flow of medium that diffuses to the cells across a porous barrier. The microfluidic cell culture array device consists of a cell culture area and a nutrient flow channel separated by a microfluidic perfusion barrier that localizes and concentrates cell within the cell culture area while allowing diffusion of nutrients from the nutrient flow channel to the cells. The cells used in the device were human hepatoma HepG2/C3A cells, which have a protein synthesis profile that closely resembles that of native liver cells and have improved albumin production compared to the HepG2 cell line.

Continuous flow of nutrients such as glucose in the bioreactor was modeled using finite element analysis software and validated by the survival and proliferation of the cells in culture. Using Trypan Blue and Live/Dead fluorescence assay, 80% viability of hepatocytes cultured in the microfluidic device was observed after 1 week of incubation. By day 8, cells exhibited liver tissue morphology of dense packing, cuboidal geometry, and indistinguishable fused membranes. In comparison, cells grown under control conditions in standard tissue culture 12-well plates appeared strongly attached to the surface and more spread with distinct instead of fused cell membranes. Cells grown in the device maintained a cell density that was 3 times higher than that of monolayer culture and results from quantitative dot-blot assays to assess hepatocyte function via albumin secretion revealed that after 4 days of culture HepG2/C3A cells were producing 3 times more albumin per cell compared with cell grown in the 12-well plates. Thus, a microfluidic environment with mass transport conditions that is physiologically similar to that experienced by hepatocytes in vivo can affect cell behavior by inducing hepatocytes to grow in a natural liver configuration with a high density of hepatocytes and maintain liver tissue specific function.

I came across this paper while searching for recent papers involving PDMS and hepatocytes in an attempt to do some background research on my group’s research idea and found the idea of microscale bioreactors to be very interesting. This technology overcomes the limitation of loss of function observed in hepatocytes grown in monolayer culture and allows a more precise control of the microenvironment experienced by the cells in the culture. This opens up many possibilities in research to determine which physiological conditions are most important to maintain differentiation and function of hepatocytes and many other cell types as well. This technology can also be applied in drug metabolism screening in a more efficient manner at the microscale level so would be very useful for testing of many pharmaceutical products.

8 comments:

Elena said...

This sounds really cool! I mean, it's ideal that in vitro hepatocytes be able to produce as much protein as those in our bodies. Would results differ if hepatocytes grown in the bioreactor were contact-inhibited? What if the cells were not contact-inhibited? Would that bring forth any problems?

That Guy said...

Wow! Cory and I actually tried to do this in BioE 121L lab. Unfortunately, we didn't have access to any sort of culture treatment for our surface so we were trying to get HeLa cells to adhere to glass. We encountered a lot of problems during our project but we did actually manage to get a few cells to adhere. We never did manage to get the cells to become confluent though. It really amazes me that they were able to get a cell density that was three times higher than a monolayer.

Brian E. Lee said...

Cell culture in devices is something I haven't heard much about, but apparently these cell cultures do even better than tissue cultures. Conveniently, by mimicking the mass transport in the liver, this device allows for easy drug delivery and testing by addition to the inlet ports.

Is this device specific to liver cell cultures, or are there other cell types that need to be grown in similar devices due to the limitations of the culture plate environments?

manyeung said...

This is very good, it makes in vitro experiment easier and more effective. I wonder can all kinds of cell use bioreactor like that. So we can just modify the bioreactor for each type of cell in order to study in vitro.

Terry D. Johnson said...

Ha ha! That T. Johnson is me!

Parminder said...

Your review articles really illustrates that how mass transport is critical for normal or in vitro culturing of cells. Is it just the mass transport that really affects the albumin production of cells or the 3D enviornment? Can that bioreactor be applied to other cell lines as well? I know you were having problems with your project and the cells were dying, now I have read this it will be interesting to see your group's presentation.

Yingqi Jiang said...

Haha, as a new guy to biology, glad to see a paper that can be mostly understood by myself. Actually this direction may be what I will look into in my future research. By the way, when I see the title, I had thought the "Lee" means Prof. Luke P. Lee in BioEnigneering dept., UCB. His work is something similar to this: employing microfabrication into biology. If you are interested in this topic, actually I recommend you to see his website: http://biopoets.berkeley.edu/.

achung said...

To Elena:

Yup. I agree. As for your questions, our experience with growing hepatocyte cells in T75 flasks showed that these hepatocytes are contact inhibited in a 2D culture, but it appears that the cells are not as contact inhibited when grown in a three dimensional environment. After working with the cells, it amazes me even more that growing the hepatocytes in this microfluidic cell culture array resulted in a cell density that was three times that observed on regular cell culture dishes. Thus, the cells grown in this microfluidic device experienced even more extensive cell-cell contact than those cultured in regular tissue culture dishes, which is preferred since cell-cell contact is observed in vivo and is needed for optimum cell functionality.

To William:

I’m glad to hear that you managed to get some cells to adhere to the glass surface. It shows gradual progress. :) Maybe if you worked on this idea in the future, you will come up with a way to get the cells to grow to confluency. Good luck!

To Brian:

This paper seemed to describe the device specifically for liver cells, but I’m sure the same idea can be used for other cells as well after some adjustments with media, fluid flow rates, nutrients, etc. to create the optimum environment that would suit the cell of interest. Also, this microfluidic device might enhance cell culture of cell types with a three-dimensional structure such as hepatocytes, renal cells, and osteoblasts more so than cell types that are associated with a two-dimensional morphology such as epithelial cells.

To Manyeung:

Yes, I agree. The cell culture process does sound a lot easier with this process since it can be automated once the cells are loaded into the device. I think this microfluidic device will greatly benefit cell culture of cell types that have greater functionality in a three dimensional environment than in a monolayer culture.

To Terry:

:) Yup! I actually didn’t realize it until I had already written the abstract and was typing the authors of the paper on the blog. I really enjoyed reading this paper and am interested to follow the progression of its application. I also realized that I actually met Philip Lee this semester after I read this paper but I didn’t see the connection until much later.

To Parminder:

Previous studies have shown that hepatocyte functionality is enhanced in a three-dimensional culture system compared to a two-dimensional monolayer culture, but the addition of the mass transport supplied by this microfluidic device provides an even better environment for hepatocyte growth and functionality since the device is more able to mimic the nutrient flow and diffusion to the cells as observed in vivo than traditional monolayer culture. Yes, I think this microfluidic device can be applied to other cell lines as long as the conditions are altered to match the optimum environment for the different cells of interest.

To Yingqi:

It’s interesting that I actually started off in the opposite order since I started with biology before I became enticed by the application of engineered devices to biology. I really enjoy the blend of biology and engineering. :) Anyways, you are actually right about the author if you look at the original paper (the title of my post is a link to the paper). I think Professor Lee’s research is very fascinating. Thank you for recommending his website and good luck with your future research!