Modulation of Rabbit Corneal Epithelial Cells Fate Using Embryonic Stem Cell Extract
Weijiao Zhan, Zhiping Liu, Ying Liu, Qicheng Ke, Yuanyuan Ding, Xiaoyan Lu, Zhichong Wang
Introduction
Conjunctivalization of the cornea and subsequent vision loss is an effect of corneal damage combined with limbal stem cell deficiency. Limbal stem cells provide an option for cell therapy; however, they are difficult to isolate and expand in an effective manner (can take a long time). The dedifferentiation or reprogramming of adult somatic cells provides another means to attain patient-specific stem cells for tissue regeneration. Previous studies have shown that embyronic stem cell (ESC)-derived cell-free factors and proteins are capable of reprogramming somatic cells into pluripotent cells without the use of nuclear transfer or transfection of reprogramming genes. The goal of this study was to develop a culture system to culture and dedifferentiate autologous somatic cells (rabbit corneal epithelial cells) into pluripotent cells for use in cell therapy and tissue engineering.
Methods
Cells
For this study, mouse ESC cell line ES-E14 was cultured and used for the extraction of embryonic stem cell extract. The cells were plated on 1% gelatin on tissue-treated culture plates with ESC culture media, where 50% of the media was changed every day. The ES-E14 cells were stained with anti-mouse Oct-4 antibody to confirm the undifferentiated state of the ESCs. Primary corneal epithelial cells were cultured from rabbit peripheral corneal tissue explants on tissue-treated culture plates with corneal epithelial medium.
Cell Extract Preparation
Cells were washed using PBS and cell lysis buffer, followed by centrifugation at 400x g, and resuspended with cell lysis buffer with a 40 minute incubation on ice. The cells were sonicated on ice until all cells and nuclei had been lysed. The lysate was centrifuged at 15000x g for 15 min at 4 degrees C. The supernatant was transferred to a 15 mL tube and snap-frozen and stored at -80 degrees C to remove any remaining living cells.
Cell Extract Treatment
The primary rabbit corneal epithelial cells were permeabilized using streptolysin-O (SLO) for 15 min at 37 degrees C with constant agitation. The cells were then resuspended in mES-cell extract, along with ATP, creatine phosphate, creatine kinase, and NTP, and incubated at 37 degrees C in a water bath with constant agitation. The cell membranes were resealed by transfer to epithelial cell culture media with CaCl2 and seeded onto a tissue culture plate for 2 hours at 37 degrees with 5% CO2. The media was then replaced with complete epithelial cell culture media and changed every other day. Colonies were isolated and transferred to ESC medium for culture.
Histology and Immunohistochemistry
This was performed after 24-48 hours of culture for Oct-4, SSEA1, K3/K12, p63, ABCG2, and Vimentin. They were counterstained with Hoechst 33342, followed by imaging using a confocal laser scanning microscope. The cells were also tested for gene expression using RT-PCR, stained with BCIP/NBT Phosphate Substrate System to test for AKP activity, and tested for tumorigenicity (teratoma formation after subcutaneous injection).
Results
The results indicated mES-colony like structures in passage 5 or week 3 of culture. The colonies were maintained in ESC medium for at least 14 weeks in culture, but began to flatten out. Oct-4 expression was detected in P2, and peaked at P9 (week 4), decreasing in subsequent weeks. SSEA1 was detected in P9, but not in P18, and neither of these markers were detected in the control samples. K3 and p63, which are specific for corneal tissue and progenitor cells, were also detected in the cells, indicating that the cells were not completely reprogrammed to and ES state, but were still capable of returning to the start of their lineage. Vimentin was not detected, indicating a lack of fibroblast contamination. ESC extract induced cells formed teratomas and were capable of differentiating into all three germ layers. AKP staining revealed positive staining at P9, but weaker staining at P18
4 comments:
While the reprogramming of corneal epithelial cells is a good idea, this method seems pretty far away from clinical application.
Also, I'm wondering if the use of ESC extract is worth the trouble. I might be wrong, but there could be immune rejection issues, as well as the usual cloud of controversy that surrounds ESCs. At this point, if I were blind, I would put up with the inefficiencies of limbal stem cell isolation.
This paper does a good job of showing some of the potential for ESCs, but definitely shows how much we have to go in order to reach practical application. The moral objection to ESCs will always be a controversial issue, and with induced pluripotency showing much promise, perhaps ESCs may not be worth it. The paper itself also would need to show the actual efficacy and functionality of the dedifferentiated cells, which leads to wonder about how powerful the technique is.
I find it interesting that the cells still maintained their tissue-specific expression. Having the expression of those genes could lead to interferences with other types of cells' proteins or cell functions. I'd like to see how they would go about to try to get rid of that problem.
You guys all introduce very good points. Although this study is far away from being used in a clinical application, it does show the potential of using the ESC extract as a means of reprogramming adult cells, which could then be used for therapeutic applications.
Post a Comment