Influence of Intermittent Pressure, Fluid Flow, and Mixing on the Regenerative Properties of Articular Chondrocytes
Scott E. Carver, Carole A. Heath
Department of Chemical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
50011-2230; telephone (515) 294-4828; fax: (515) 294-2689; e-mail:
cheath@iastate.edu
Received 1 July 1998; accepted 13 May 1999
Summary:
This paper examines the effects of physical stimuli on growing cartilaginous tissue constructs from chondrocytes embedded in a polyglycolic acid matrix. In order to develop an articular cartilage replacement suitable in vivo, the tissue construct must have an ECM with native levels of type II collagen and sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAG) and a compressive modulus comparable to healthy tissues. Previous studies have shown that a three dimensional environment is needed for type II collagen production and dynamic pressure increases collagen concentration. It also been demonstrated that either intermittent pressure or fluid flow alone can increase GAG level. Convection helps to overcome mass transfer limitations, which results in larger tissue constructs than in an unmixed system.
Department of Chemical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
50011-2230; telephone (515) 294-4828; fax: (515) 294-2689; e-mail:
cheath@iastate.edu
Received 1 July 1998; accepted 13 May 1999
Summary:
This paper examines the effects of physical stimuli on growing cartilaginous tissue constructs from chondrocytes embedded in a polyglycolic acid matrix. In order to develop an articular cartilage replacement suitable in vivo, the tissue construct must have an ECM with native levels of type II collagen and sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAG) and a compressive modulus comparable to healthy tissues. Previous studies have shown that a three dimensional environment is needed for type II collagen production and dynamic pressure increases collagen concentration. It also been demonstrated that either intermittent pressure or fluid flow alone can increase GAG level. Convection helps to overcome mass transfer limitations, which results in larger tissue constructs than in an unmixed system.
The authors created a system that combined mixed and pressurized environments with fluid flow and studied their effects on foal articular chondrocyte cultures over a 6-week period. Mixing was provided by growing cells in spinner flasks. For applying intermittent pressure (5 seconds on/15 seconds off), a reactor that applied 3.44 MPa for 20 min every four hours was used. Medium perfusion took place during the rest of the time the cultures were in the reactor. They performed a series of five experiments: (1) 1 week in spinner, 5 weeks in reactor with no pressure, (2) 1 week in spinner, 5 weeks in reactor with pressure, (3) 2 weeks in spinner, 4 weeks in reactor with pressure, (4) 4 weeks in spinner, 2 weeks in reactor with pressure, and (5) 6 weeks in spinner. The cultures were assayed for cell concentration, GAG and collagen concentrations and compressive moduli.
Assays for the concentration of GAG and type II collagen demonstrated that a combination of pressure and flow led to higher GAG and collagen concentration than from just applying pressure or fluid flow alone. This suggested a synergistic relationship of the physical stimuli and that the optimal culture environment was one that had both pressure and fluid flow. From SEM images, cells that benefitted from convective mass transfer had earlier ECM development, resulting in a denser ECM by week 6. Mixing also promoted cellular attachment and distribution, which helped the tissue grow larger in size.
The compressive modulus determined from measurement of the strength of the material and was shown to be directly proportional to GAG level, which meant that those cells in mixing and pressurized environments were more resistive to compression. However, the compressive modulus in the tissue construct was not nearly high as that in native tissues. The authors suggested that it may be due to GAG not aggregating to form a similar structure found in vivo. Another possible explanation was that the low levels of collagen limited the tissue’s resistance to compression as collagen normally serves to aggregate proteoglycan of the ECM. The paper finishes by indicating the importance of physical stimuli on composition and structural properties that can be used to produce functional tissues.
Relevance
Osteoarthritis is the most common form of arthritis in the United States and can normally be reversed if detected early by injections. The studies discussed in this paper are useful for developing tissue grafts for patients in later stages of osteoarthritis, when the defect is large. By studying the stimuli that affect the regenerative properties of articular chondrocytes, the tissue construct can be grown in such a way that it would act as healthy cartilage tissue.
This paper demonstrates the importance of applying physical stimuli that cells normally experience in vivo for engineering functional tissues. These conditions will affect the structural properties and protein composition of the tissue. This is an important lesson for tissue engineering as mimicking the environment in vivo will likely lead to tissues that are structurally and compositionally similar to those found in the body.
9 comments:
Does the paper suggest what factors in the engineered tissue caused GAG not to aggregate and why collagen II didn't aggregate proteoglycans in the ECM? Do they mention having any future plans to combine mechanical stimulation with solutions to the aformentioned issues, in order to create much stronger tissue?
Did the authors mention what kind of cells they used, and how they got them? If so, do you think the cell type is close enough to human chondrocytes that this experiment is a worthwhile step in the effort to induce articular cartilage production for humans?
Type II collagen is important for tensile strength of tissue (like hyaline or articular cartilage), while type I collagen is more relevant in tissue repair (fibrocartilage). So, in your summary you discussed how collagen type II is important in the development of articular cartilage. I was wondering how the type II collagen concentrations were related to the tensile strength of the material and perhaps could they be related to GAG levels? Do you think that type I collagen concentrations were reduced, in relation to how much type II collagen was made?
Matthew:
In the paper, it states that the GAG do aggregate and collagen II do aggregate proteoglycans, but not to the extent as seen in vivo. They, however, do not explain why that may be the case. I speculate that it may be due to growth time or that all the forces in joints may not be there. They did not describe their future plans, but I suspect that they are continuing with study as it shows promise and there are much more to study.
Eric:
They used primary equine articular chondrocytes by surgically excising them from the stifle joint of juvenile horses. I believe that this study is relatively new so they are trying to get some results to see whether or not their work is worth pursuing. I think most of the work with these chondrocytes serves to build up the ground work to study what forces are important. Thus, I believe that these cells are similar enough to tell the authors what forces are important because I believe a lot of forces that humans and horses experience are similar.
Atul:
GAG concentration is directly proportional to the compressive modulus and collagen helps to aggregate proteoglycans to give it strength. From my knowledge, the pressurized systems are to induce production GAG and collagen II. Since pressure doesn't directly relate to collagen I production, I believe collagen I concentration should be the same.
Interesting!!
My group used different cells (MCF-7 breast cancer cells), but this makes me curious that if mixing and pressure will increase the proliferation of MCF-7 cells. I know that breast cancer may experience less physical forces in vivo and therefore less sensitive to those forces. Yet, I want to try growing MCF-cells in spinning flask but in 2D/3D and compare with the proliferation in static culture. If we can find obvious increase in dynamic culture, we might be able to prevent the breast cancer cell by prevent those force to reach the breast cancer tumor in the future (or Not….=P)
So I’m curious about the culture condition they use. Do they state in paper the reasons they used polyglycolic acid matrix not agarose? Is it because polyglycolic acid matrix is more similar to vivo environment?
It might be only me, but I didn’t get if polyglycolic acid matrix is solid or liquid matrix. When you say “medium perfusion”, it seems like your matrix is solid like agarose but I’m not sure.
But if the matrix is liquid, I wonder how more mixing can result in more cellular attachment.
Actually, I wonder where the cell is attached to if the matrix is liquid.
I thought of how to increase the aggregation of GAG. I wonder if they applied same direction of fluid flow and pressure. I bet fluid flow is one direction because spinner flask usually just spins in one direction. Yet, I think our vivo cartilage experiences more complex forces from different directions. If I were them, I want to apply more irregular amounts and directions of pressure and fluid flow to see if we can get more GAG aggregation along with more collagen II. Then run the experiments with less variables to identify the major causes (ex. only changing direction of pressure and fluid flow while keeping the MPa and rpm same).
Like cell experience one-direction of fluid flow usually line up neatly, the GAG might also have distributed in ECM neatly (not messy aggregation) alone the one-direction flow/pressure. So I think this is worthwhile trying. What do you think?
If you can address my question for the state (liquid/solid) of polyglycolic acid matrix, I’ll be satisfied~~
MK:
If I'm not mistaken I think PGA is a mesh with a lot of void to permit flow. To answer you question, I believe PGA behaves very much a like a membrane. With regard to your question about the directionality of flow/pressure, I think the researchers are doing tests right now to identify important forces, and eventually I believe they will tweak the forces so that the forces will be more like those in the joint.
Articular cartilage in the knee joint is partitioned into several layers which all have different structural orientations. It would be interesting to see if in a later study, the authors can try replicating the different orientations of each layer and then study the effects on GAG, collagen and cellularity by using the same parameters used here on what seems to be only one sort of collagen matrix.
This paper seems to offer a dynamic study on regenerative properties of articular chondrocytes, with a potential for engineering functional tissue for osteoarthritis. May I ask why type II collagen is used in the experiment instead of type I? Also, did the authors mention what other characteristics need to be further studied beside intermittent pressure, fluid flow, and mixing on the regerenative properites of articular chondrocytes?
Iuqiddis:
I agree with you that it is indeed very interesting. I think the fluid flow will contribute the orientation with shear forces.
Audrey:
Collagen II is studied because that is the protein that is an indicator of strength. The author did not mention any future works, but I think hypoxia is an important factor as well.
Post a Comment