Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Tissue engineering applied to the retinal prosthesis: Neurotrophin-eluting polymeric hydrogel coatings

Fig. 1. Multi-electrode polyimide array for retinal prosthesis studies. The array has 15 electrodes each 400 mm in diameter arranged in a 3 × 5 matrix.


Summary:

This article discusses the possibility of improving visual prosthetics for those who have lost or severely damaged their visual ability. The current prospective replacement for a damaged retina (where the photoreceptors are located) is using a multi-electrode polyimide array as seen in the photograph above. One of the problems faced by bioengineers is that this array transmits low resolution due to the relatively large electrodes that require a high stimulation threshold. Scientists cannot reduce the size of the electrodes because a larger size is needed to decrease charge density that would otherwise cause damage to the electrodes and the tissue surrounding it. Additionally, implantation of devices often involves scar tissue that increases the physical separation between the electrodes and neurons, thereby creating an even greater threshold. In this study they use a popular neural tissue engineering material, biodegradable drug-releasing hydrogels, to try to improve these electron-tissue concerns. An advantage of using these hydrogels is that they can be engineered to release neurotrophins (i.e. BDNF, or brain derived neurotrophic factor), which can promote neuron survival and neurite extensions, and can effectively bring the neurons closer to the electrodes in the retina.

This experimental study cultured explants of rabbit retinas in neurotrophin-eluting PEGPLA poly(ethyleneglycol)-poly(lactic acid) hydrogel boluses to study the effect of BDNF-releasing polymer boluses on neurite length. These cultures were then exposed to six different medium conditions: 1540LA2, 1540LA4 BDNF-releasing boluses, BDNF+ control, 1540LA2 and 1540LA4 BSA-releasing shams, and negative control receiving no BDNF for 7 days in vitro. The results of this study indicate that there is a significant increase in neurite length after 7 days in samples exposed to BDNF in comparison to the control study. Additionally, it was found that the polymer itself does not increase neurite length. BDNF was not found to make a significant difference in neurite density. After 14 days, neurite length only increased for BDNF+ samples. Possible explanations of these findings include the possibility that: BDNF affects cell adhesion of the explants to the cell culture layer, or a BDNF concentration gradient caused a slow/stop in neurite growth. These significances led the researchers to conclude that PEGPLA hydrogel boluses can promote short-term neurite extension and that PEGPLA + BDNF boluses can promote extension equal to or better than BDNF being directly injected into the culture medium. On the other hand, a decline in BDNF release induces a retraction of growth in neurites.


Why I chose this article:

Most people consider vision as the most valued of their senses (at least I do). Also, there is much medical and technological advancement that has not been touched upon in the study of vision (e.g. a permanent treatment for glaucoma or corrective vision). This study shows one significant method for increasing neurite growth in the retina, which brings us a step closer to developing a better resolution multi-electrode array for use as a retinal prosthetic. It also provides a vision (no pun intended) for other bioengineers to look for other factors besides BDNF to sustainably extend neurite length. In the very distant future, this could eventually even lead to bioengineering a fully-functional prosthetic eye (not just the retina!)… and wouldn’t that be pretty awesome?

4 comments:

Terry D. Johnson said...

How would you propose to deal with the retraction issue if you were on this project?

Ginger Chan said...

Very interesting! Perhaps BDNF-eluting hydrogels could be used for reconstruction of torn nerve bundles in the body! For this particular application however, how would neurite extension circumvent the problem of fibrotic encapsulation? Are the neurites able to penetrate scar tissue? If they manage to improve the neurite-electrode interface, how likely is it to lead to a problem like retinal detachment?

Christie Brown said...

Interesting article that highlights the importance of growth factors in encouraging neuronal cell growth. Did the article mention how long the implanted material would be able to release a useful amount of BDNF and how well the hydrogel would hold up in the body in the long term? For example, is there significant protein adsorption?

Joanne Y. said...

Terry:
If I were to make up a new model entirely, I would look into making a polymer implant that could hold viable BNDF-releasing cells rather than gels that elute BNDF, though given my lack of knowledge on the subject I don't know how (im)possible that would be.

More practically, I would probably try to use some kind of cell-adhesion molecule to prevent the neurites from retracting. This was mentioned as a suggestion in the article and I think it's the best suggestion for this particular project. They also mentioned the possibility of combining the PEGPLA boluses with poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) microspheres to extend the release duration of BNDF.

Ginger: I don't believe they have figured a way to circumvent the fibrotic scar tissue, but this study seems to suggest a NG2 proteoglycan is the cause of inhibiting axon regeneration. Perhaps they could target NG2 cells as a part of a patient's treatment process while implementing this treatment. Retinal detachment?: that's a good question. I would think it would be equally likely, if not more susceptible to retinal detachment given that it's an implant. Maybe the focus on that should be molecules that can help with cell adhesion as I mentioned earlier to Terry?

Christie: The article mentioned that they had different polymers that released BNDF for different lengths of time. This study was done in vitro, but they researchers suggest that perhaps neurite length retracted due to concentration issues (the hydrogels containing BNDF release based on diffusion). They say that it's likely that cells with this implant in vivo will probably metabolize some of the BNDF being produced, but they also mentioned they could potentially extend release to a lifetime (indefinitely), as I mentioned above to Terry. They did not mention how well the polymer of hydrogels hold in cells, but they suggest that this project should be tested in vivo.