In Vitro-Cultured Meat Production
P.D. Edelman, D.C. McFarland, V.A Mironov, J.G. Matheny. Commentary: In vitro-cultured meat production. Tissue Eng. 2005 May-Jun;11(5-6):659-62
http://www.hedweb.com/animimag/invitro-culturedmeat.pdf
Most of what we consider edible meat is formed of skeletal muscle tissue. The idea of creating cultured meat basically involves growing large numbers of myoblasts on a scaffold that are differentiated into myofibers which can be harvested, processed and cooked into a meat product (boneless, ground). More ambitious ideas would be producing highly structured meat, like steak, which has been shown to be more difficult to tissue engineer in vitro due to the lack of blood circulation.
Skeletal muscle is formed of various cell types. Fibers are formed from myoblasts and satellite cells that join to form large multinucleated syncytia. The most practical cell source for cultured meat is either embryonic myoblasts or skeletal muscle satellite cells. Satellite cells have been cultured from chickens, turkeys, pigs, lambs, and cattle. They have differentiated to form immature muscle fibers called myotubes. Replicating unprocessed meat would be difficult requiring fibroblasts for the connective tissue and possibly fat cells within the same culture organized into a 3D structure. Replicating a processed meat source would be much simpler and could use a single line of myogenic cells.
The quantity of cells that could be reproduced is not known and may be limited by a fixed number of doublings called the Hayflick limit. Satellite cells from turkey were shown to express telemorase giving them a higher Hayflick limit. A single satellite cell with a Hayflick limit of 75 could theoretically satisfy the world demand for meat. Species not expressing telemorase may require transfection with the telemorase gene or proliferation of stem cells in culture before differentiation into myoblasts. Differentiation of myoblasts into myotubes has been shown with the aid of mechanical or electromagnetic stress on the growing cells.
Myoblasts require a scaffold for attachment allowing proliferation and differentiation. The scaffold must be edible for production of meat and flexible to allow stressing of myoblasts to induce differentiation. One possible scaffold would be to use edible, porous microspheres that stretch in responses to changes in pH or temperature. These spheres could be made of collagen, cellulose, alginate or chitosan. Thin sheets of muscle fiber could be cultured and mechanically stretched to induce development of aligned myotubes. The thin scaffold membranes could be extracted from the meat or left on if made of edible material. Several sheets of tissue could be combined to get the required thickness or processed to make a meat product. A scaffold for non-processed meat would be much more difficult to produce because of vascularization requirements that would require a network of edible, elastic, and porous material to exchange nutrients with the cells.
The media used to grow these cells would likely have to be cheap yet contain high levels of nutrients. Some promising alternatives include serum free media made from shitake mushroom extract. Proper levels of growth factors are also necessary for the media. Large volume bioreactors that maintain low shear and uniform perfusion such as rotating bioreactors would enhance the growth process.
Cultured meat could provide many benefits including control of ratio of saturated and unsaturated fat, reduction of food borne disease, improvement of meat nutrient content, and reduction of resources and pollution associated with farm animals. Whether or not cultured meat will be cost efficient is debatable but the technological obstacles are fewer than those for tissue engineering in clinical applications
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
This is an incredibly fascinating concept. As a person who is not a big fan of meat or greenhouse gases, I would definitely support this research. Are there more published papers on this? Have any economic feasibility studies been done?
that IS fascinating. have they actually cultured the meat, cooked it, and tried eating it...? or is it still an idea?
This paper is very insteresting. Given their idea of growing many cell layers on top of each other to get the desired shape of commercial meat, the problem is how to connect these skeletal muscle cells together. I'm not sure whether they did experiment on examining the ECM and/or adding other connective tissue to the culture. I wonder there is a way to preserve these cultured meat in a frige or we just have to cook them right after extracting them from the culture given the issues about genetic mutations and protein denaturation.
Very interesting ideas. I wonder how big of a piece of meat can be cultured this way. Any efforts shown to drive this research forward and make edible meat culture practical?
It is a very interesting concept that would dramatically change our daily life. I wonder if the artificially manufactured meat would be safe to eat and also taste good at the same time. Is there any other way of culturing myoblasts in 3D other than having layers on top of each other? Having layers of myoblasts seems very unnatural and unstable,
i have on problem with this idea, i'm assuming they would not use cell lines for this, i mean who the hell dare to eat cancer meat. since primary cells can only divide a small number of times, if they are using primary cells such a facility would still need a large stock of cows/pig/chicken and need to regularly remove muscles from them.
It would be very interesting if someone actually compared the energy input to protein output ratios between engineered meat and beef cattle production.
With regards to whether this has actually been done, the answer is yes. Some say it would be feasible to have cultured meat available in a decade. People have already tasted cultured meat. Here is a quote from a Popular Mechanics article (from New Harvest website):
'And, in 2003, a group of hungry artists from the University of Western Australia grew kidney bean-size steaks from biopsied frogs and prenatal sheep cells. Cooked in herbs and flambĂ©ed for eight brave dinner guests, the slimy frog steaks came attached to small strips of fabric — the growth scaffolding. Half the tasters spit out their historic dinner. (Perhaps more significant, half didn't.)'
There are many more articles and links about culturing meat at the website for New Harvest (a research non-profit for meat alternatives, www.new-harvest.org)
As for current research, there are various efforts being funded ranging from NASA funding projects for cultured meat for long term space travel to research at Stegman, a Dutch sausage company ,looking at the cultured meat from an economic savings standpoint.
With regards to economics, in vitro meat currently costs $1000 to $5000 per pound to produce. This is much higher than production costs of meat from animals but the costs will come down with automation of the growth process and cheaper nutrient sources. Some sceintists believe that advances in these areas could drive the price below $1 a pound.
With regards to 3D culture of myoblasts. It seems like the two methods tested were growing the cells on thin sheets of membranes or using deformable microbeads. MIT researchers have figured out a way to grow muscle cells in culture that has it's own blood vessels so this may be a better option for a 3D culture in the future.
As for preservation and risk of genetic mutations I think once the meat is out of the culture it would probably have a shelf-life similar to regular meat. And according to Terry's comment cooking a tumor just makes it meat...
Although I don't doubt the eventual feasibility of growing meat, I think that it isn't going to get very far any time in the foreseeable future due to the stigma of eating lab-grown meat. Seeing qualms today on simple issues such as organic versus non-organic produce, I really think that the day that lab-grown meat is consumed on a regular basis will not come for many hundreds of years.
On the science behind growing meat, it's the same as the effort to generate replacement organs. Interestingly, will our notions of cannibalism change when human replacement organs can be created? I can already imagine some people eating these organs for the novelty.
Brian,
What about chimeric meat? You could easily create a tissue from a combination of cells as well.
Post a Comment